Drawing for ETRUSCAN WHOLE GRAIN

USPTO serial 78944163

ETRUSCAN WHOLE GRAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETRUSCAN WHOLE GRAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. Bacall

CHARLES P BACALL VERRILL DANA LLPPO BOX 586PORTLAND, ME 04112-0586UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bread, sandwiches, bagels and pizza for consumption on and off the premisesACTIVEAug 28, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 31, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 30, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 13, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 3, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance