Drawing for KITCHEN & TABLE

USPTO serial 78944986

KITCHEN & TABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KITCHEN & TABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRK S. O'NEILL

HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP646 S MAIN AVESAN ANTONIO, TX 78204-1210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food blenders; electric can openers; electric coffee grindersACTIVE—
008Flatware, namely, forks, knives and spoons; cutleryACTIVE—
011Electric toasters; electric coffee makers; electric kitchen cooking appliances, namely, electric grills, slow cookers, and fondue setsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 16, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 4, 2008LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Dec 21, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance