USPTO serial 78945196
SUNTAN SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNTAN SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101-5726UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated sun care and skin care preparations | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |