Drawing for DUAL SPORT

USPTO serial 78945466

DUAL SPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUAL SPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BUILDING400 SEVENTH ST. NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorcycles and structural parts thereforACTIVEDec 12, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 3, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 31, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 29, 2010GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 29, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 21, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 21, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 21, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance