Drawing for LEHIGH WATER SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78946327

LEHIGH WATER SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEHIGH WATER SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES N. QUINN

CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET ST FL 10PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Leasing water treatment and processing equipment, namely, high output portable and non-portable de-watering machinesACTIVEOct 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 24, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 27, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 27, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance