USPTO serial 78946818
ROCK ROYALTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK ROYALTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
Michael J. MacDermott CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | BAGS, CASES AND FASHION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CHANGE PURSES, PURSES, HANDBAGS, TOTE BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, BEACH BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, CARRY BAGS, BARREL BAGS, WAIST PACKS, BACKPACKS, KNAPSACKS, SCHOOL BAGS, SATCHELS, TRAVEL BAGS, WAIST BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, JEWELRY BAGS FOR TRAVEL, LEATHER BAGS FOR PACKING MERCHANDISE, LEATHER AND TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS, MESH SHOPPING BAGS, WALLETS, CLASPS FOR BAGS, LUGGAGE, TRAVEL BAGS, ATTACHE CASES, TRAVEL CASES SOLD EMPTY, OVERNIGHT CASES, BRIEFCASES, DOCUMENT CASES, CREDIT CARD CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, TOILETRY CASES AND VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, JEWELRY CASES OF LEATHER OR TEXTILE, KEY CASES AND LEATHER KEY CHAINS, LUGGAGE TRUNKS, LUGGAGE CASES AND LUGGAGE TAGS AND STRAPS FOR LUGGAGE | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | APPAREL, NAMELY, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BANDANAS, WRIST BANDS, BASEBALL CAPS, BATHING SUITS, BATHROBES, BEACHWEAR, CLOTHING BELTS, GARTER BELTS, BLOUSES, BODY SUITS, BOOTS, BOXER SHORTS, BRASSIERES, BRIEFS, BUSTIERS, CAMISOLES, CAPS, CHEMISES, COATS, CORSETS, COVERALLS, DRESSES, DRESSING GOWNS, EVENING GOWNS, FOOTWEAR, GLOVES, GOWNS, HALTER TOPS, HATS, HEAD WEAR, HEAD BANDS, JACKETS, JEANS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPSUITS, KIMONOS, KNEE HIGHS, KNIT SHIRTS, LEG WARMERS, LINGERIE, MINISKIRTS, MONEY BELTS, NECKWEAR, OVERALLS, OVERCOATS, PAJAMAS, PANTIES, PANTS, ROBES, SANDALS, SARONGS, SCARVES, SHIRTS, SHOES, SHORTS, SKIRTS, SKORTS, SLEEPWEAR, SLIPPERS, SLIPS, SNEAKERS, SOCKS, SUITS, SUSPENDERS, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWIMWEAR, T-SHIRTS, TRACKSUITS, TROUSERS AND UNDERWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHERYL G. RIXON DAVIS
- Other trademarks owned by CHERYL G. RIXON DAVIS
- Other trademarks owned by Arthur H. Davis
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ROCK ROYALTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |