Drawing for CRS CLEAR RINSE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 78947749

CRS CLEAR RINSE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3309963Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRS CLEAR RINSE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

POLLIE GAUTSCH

POLLIE GAUTSCH DE NOVO LEGAL LLP171 SAXONY RD STE 209ENCINITAS, CA 92024-6777UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purification products, namely, water purifiers, water purification tanks, water purification units, and water treatment products, namely, cartridge filtration units, and water filtering systems comprised of water filtersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 6, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2007C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Nov 14, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 16, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 28, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance