Drawing for SEXY BITCH

USPTO serial 78948298

SEXY BITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEXY BITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carrie L. Kiedrowski, Samuel Najim, J'lene Ancell

Carrie L. Kiedrowski Jones Day1420 Peachtree Street, N.E.Suite 800Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non medicated grooming preparations for cats, dogs, and household pets, namely shampoos, conditioners, breath fresheners, dentifrices and perfumesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance