Drawing for SHOCK

USPTO serial 78948634

SHOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Kalka

DANIEL KALKA EATON CORPORATION1111 SUPERIOR AVE ECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2529UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf club grips, handle grips for sporting equipmentACTIVEMar 29, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 10, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 23, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 23, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance