USPTO serial 78949225
COBALT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COBALT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carstens
David W. Carstens Carstens & Cahoon, LLPP.O. Box 802334Dallas, TX 75380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Knives, namely, hunting knives, folding knives, chef knives, kitchen knives, butcher knives, paring knives, fishing knives, or sport knives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Aug 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Aug 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | โ |
| Feb 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | โ |
| Jul 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | โ |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jan 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | โ |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Jul 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | โ |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 27, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | โ |
| Jan 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | โ |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | โ |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | โ |
| Jul 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 25, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Jun 19, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |