USPTO serial 78949371
RENÉE'S GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENÉE'S GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Getz
SABRINA J HUDSON H J HEINZ COMPANYP O BOX 57PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food; baby formula | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Cranberry sauce; applesauce; instant or pre-cooked soup; soup mixes; jams; meat and fish pastes and spreads; meat extracts; dried vegetables; dried fruits; preserved fruits; preserved vegetables; canned vegetables; canned fruits; meat jellies; meat juices; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; pates; hazelnut spreads; peanut butter; jellies; potato chips; frozen vegetables; pickled vegetables; processed fruit; candied fruit; crystallized fruit; fruit chips; fruit conserves; fruit pastes; fruit pectin; fruit peels; fruit preserves; fruit pulps; fruit rinds; candied fruit snacks; fruit toppings; fruit based spreads; frozen fruits; unprocessed fruits preserved in alcohol; cooking oil; edible oil; salad oil; vegetable oil; olive oil; processed olives; vegetable pastes; dairy based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt, namely cheese based snack foods; fruit based snack foods; fruit salads; garden salads; vegetable salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | meat sauces; marinades; dipping sauces; dressings for fruit; pizza sauces; barbeque sauces; cheese based sauces; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; pasta sauces; vegetable sauces; fish sauces; seafood sauces; poultry sauces; dessert sauces; mayonnaise; vinaigrettes; salsa; chutney; mustard; dry seasoning mixes for gravy, spaghetti, stews and fajitas; spices for meat, fish, and poultry, namely wet rubs; spice mixes; splashes, namely, meat sauces; sizzlers, namely, meat sauces; bread dips; brushetta; fruit coulis; meat and fish sauces in the nature of relishes; pasta; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; pastries; rolls; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; biscuits; cookies; crackers; chocolate spreads; bread; pies; cakes; sugar confectionery, namely, crystal sugar pieces; candy; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate bars; puddings; macaroni; muffins; chocolate muffins; cakes, namely, swiss rolls; brownies; tarts; bread sticks; vinegar; ketchup; tomato sauces; caramel coated popcorn; caramel coated peanuts; cereal based snack foods; corn chips; pita chips; tortilla chips; rice based snack foods; wheat based snack foods; macaroni salads; pasta salads; rice salad | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh vegetables; fresh fruits; unprocessed vegetables; unprocessed fruit; fresh olives; raw olives | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices, vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intercorp Excelle Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named RENÉE'S GOURMET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |