USPTO serial 78949587
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr., Reg. No. 25,689
ALBERT B. KIMBALL, JR., REG. NO. 25,689 BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2770UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | wax, industrial oils and greases; lubricants, namely, all purpose lubricants, drilling lubricants, dust absorbing and wetting compositions, namely, dust laying and absorbing compositions for use on unpaved roads, petroleum based dust absorbing compositions for use in road building, dustlaying; dust binding compositions; fuels, namely, mineralized spirits for motors; and illuminants, namely, candles and wicks for lighting | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |