USPTO serial 78949735
HEEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald M. Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jerald M. Tenenbaum MORRISON TENENBAUM, PLLC87 Walker Street, Floor 2c/o Jerald M. Tenenbaum, Esq.NEW YORK, NY 10013-1406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING NEWS, INFORMATION, EVENTS, CALENDARS, BLOGS AND JOURNALS FEATURING VARIOUS TOPICS, NAMELY RELIGION, SOCIAL INTERACTION AND POPULAR CULTURE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL INTERACTION AND DATING | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |