Drawing for CDMA CERTIFICATION FORUM CERTIFIED PRODUCT

USPTO serial 78950735

CDMA CERTIFICATION FORUM CERTIFIED PRODUCT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CDMA CERTIFICATION FORUM CERTIFIED PRODUCT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick K. Perrin

Patrick K. Perrin Berg Hill Greenleaf & Ruscitti LLP1712 Pearl StreetBoulder, CO 80302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AWireless Telecommunication ProductsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2010IULNITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
May 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 30, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jan 19, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance