CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MY DISCOVERY

USPTO serial 78951371

MY DISCOVERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY DISCOVERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony V. Lupo

Anthony V. Lupo ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Audio and video broadcasting services featuring uploaded, posted, displayed and shared electronic media via the Internet or other communications network; electronic mail and instant messaging services; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for the electronic transmission of messages among users in the fields of general interestACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for the uploading and posting of audio-visual content and for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions; offering customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 5, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance