Drawing for ICHART

USPTO serial 78952052

ICHART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICHART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jayne Conway Hunter

JAYNE CONWAY HUNTER ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON101 N TRYON ST STE 1900CHARLOTTE, NC 28246-0106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for organizing, maintaining and updating patients' medical records for individual practices, physician networks and hospital systems for both regional and national interoperability of patient clinical dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 15, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 15, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance