USPTO serial 78952147
CRYSTAL CHIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3882599Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 2010
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYSTAL CHIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel T. Earle
Daniel T. Earle SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HIGHWAY, SUITE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Key chains of precious metal; jewelry; precious stones; costume jewelry; jewelry chains; ornaments of precious metal; ornaments of jewelry, namely, earrings, jewelry bracelets, brooches; medals; necklaces; ornamental pins; jewelry rings; cuff links; watches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Handbags; pouches of leather or imitation leather for packaging; rucksacks; luggage trunks and traveling bags; suit cases; leather key cases; purses; wallets; vanity cases sold empty; umbrellas; parasols | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coats, jackets, sweaters, shirts, tee-shirts, skirts, pants, dresses, night wear, underwear, aprons, hosiery, fur stoles, socks, stockings, shawls, scarves, gloves, neckties, mufflers, neckerchiefs, waistbands, sashes for wear, belts; hats, caps and footwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L'EST CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by L'EST CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by L'EST CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CRYSTAL CHIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |