USPTO serial 78952673
GUARANTEED PLAY POKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUARANTEED PLAY POKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Magdalena M. Fincham
MAGDALENA M FINCHAM CASINO TRADEMARKSWALKER DIGITAL MANAGEMENT LLC2 HIGH RIDGE PARKSTAMFORD, CT 06905Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming machines, namely, video poker machines which accept a wager or an indication of wager, as well as components therefor, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and software associated therewith; handheld devices operable to facilitate games conducted on the afore-mentioned gaming machines; game, entertainment, recreational and amusement machines and apparatus, namely video game machines for use with televisions; machines for playing games of chance in the nature of fruit machines; machines for playing card games, namely video poker machines and video blackjack machines; cabinets adapted to gaming machines; controlling apparatus, namely, reel mechanism controllers, mother boards, modular units in the nature of ROM; replacement parts for the aforesaid machines; software for operating machines used in the gaming industry; servers operable to facilitate play on the aforesaid gaming machines; coin, cashless ticket or token-operated slot machines from which money can be won; coin, cashless ticket or token-operated slot machines which are programmed to pay small rewards or prizes, whether monetary or otherwise or by scoring points, to successful operators; coin, cashless ticket or token-operated slot machines associated with video machines which are programmed to pay small rewards or prizes, whether monetary or otherwise or by scoring points; dispensers that count or measure output for use with coins, notes, tokens, tickets, vouchers or prizes; computers and computer terminals for providing information or for on-line access or communication purposes; video poker machines operated by coins, notes, tokens, cash less tickets and credit being credit loyalty or debit cards; mounting racks for computer hardware for the aforesaid goods; computer game software, control equipment and apparatus for all the aforesaid machines, namely, electrical reel mechanism controllers, mother boards and processors, and memory cards in the nature of ROM cards; electrical and electrical apparatus and equipment for handling, storage, input and output and transfer of data for monitoring operation of all the aforesaid machines, namely, modems and network interface cards which can be plugged into the aforesaid machines or which otherwise interface wit the aforesaid machines to download data concerning the operation of such machines for purposes of monitoring performance and combating fraud and interference with such performance and operation, and modems and network interface cards which permit the transfer of data to and from remote computers for the display of information concerning their performance and operation, and combating fraud and interference and fault diagnostic purposes;and game, entertainment, recreational and amusement machine upgrade and modification kits for all the aforesaid goods, comprising updated versions of the above-listed software, equipment and apparatus, and component parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Game, entertainment, recreational and amusement machines and apparatus, namely arcade-type electronic video games, coin-operated video games, hand-held unit for playing video games, stand-alone video game machines, stand-alone video output game machines, amusement game machines, LCD game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair of game machines and apparatus, namely upgrade, modification and rebuilding of gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing use of gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and related apparatus, namely, providing casino facilities and amusement arcades; rental and leasing of electronic gaming, entertainment and amusement machines; consulting services in the field of gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; amusement arcades, namely, providing gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus at sites for entertainment and amusement purposes; entertainment in the nature of contests and competitions in the field of playing gaming, entertainment and amusement machines and apparatus; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Walker Digital Gaming, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GUARANTEED PLAY POKER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |