USPTO serial 78953650
CASHVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CASHVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Douglas, Isle of Man, GB
Douglas, Isle of Man, GB
DOUGLAS, IM, US
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Douglas, Isle of Man, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric R. Moran
ERIC R. MORAN MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE31ST FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60606-6709Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing [ telephonically or live or ] online games of chance and [, telephonically or live or online games of skill and telephonically or live or ] online casino style games | ACTIVE | Jul 21, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Waterleaf Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Waterleaf Limited
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CORK GROUP TRADING LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Waterleaf Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CASHVILLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |