USPTO serial 78953955
VAMPIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAMPIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Machat
MICHAEL MACHAT LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL MACHAT PC9107 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 425BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-5550UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Beef; Beef patties; Cheese; Fruit-based food beverage; Hamburger ; Lobsters ; Meat; Meat, frozen; Olive oil; Processed olives; Shrimps, prawns and lobsters ; Uncooked hamburger patties | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Hamburger sandwiches; Hot sauce; Sauces; Sauces for barbecued meat; Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; Tomato sauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh lemons; Fresh olives; Fresh oranges; Fresh peaches; Lobsters ; Raw olives; Live Shrimps, prawns and lobsters ; Unprocessed olives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Machat, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Machat, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named VAMPIRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |