USPTO serial 78954050
PRANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd S. Bontemps, Esq, John W. Crittenden, Janet L. Cullum, Andrew Hartman, Anne H. Peck, Kent M. Walker, Peter J. Willsey, Keith J. Berets, Emily F. Burns, Susan D. Berney-Key, Christen Dubois, Noel K. Egnatios, Brendan Hughes, Lisa K. Koenig, Nishan Kot
TODD S. BONTEMPS, COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6th STREET, NW, STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; fortified candy bars; tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Skylark Sport Marketing Corporation.
- Other trademarks owned by Skylark Sport Marketing Corporation.
- Other trademarks owned by PRANA LIVING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PRANA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |