USPTO serial 78954475
PATTERN-LOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PATTERN-LOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Liebowitz
Rebecca A. Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine components for controlling an abrasive as it is hurled by a shot blast wheel sold as an integral component of shot blast wheels | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |