Drawing for ACCELERATOR

USPTO serial 78955546

ACCELERATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCELERATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam Sheehan

ADAM SHEEHAN LARSON NEWMAN ABEL POLANSKY & WHITE LLP5914 W COURTYARD DR STE 200AUSTIN, TX 78730-4911UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for collecting and managing data in the health care fieldACTIVEFeb 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 13, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 13, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 19, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance