USPTO serial 78955936
LITTLE BIRD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE BIRD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mc Caysville, GA
Mc Caysville, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security equipment in the nature of self-acting unified thought elements that, in combination, create cognitive controlled environment perimeter security for correctional and prison facilities, government and military buildings, utility companies, water and wastewater treatment plants, waterworks distribution networks, industrial plants and refineries, industrial/commercial properties, airports, marinas, auto dealerships, normal residential homes, and manufacturing systems, namely, programming logic computers, computer hardware, system boards and processors, computer interface boards, ethernet cards and cables, computer networking hardware, computer chips, computer memories, computer memory hardware, microchips, microprocessors, computer network hubs, switches and routers, computer display monitors, computer terminals, and power supplies sold therewith; Ultra High Speed trigger systems comprising fiber-optic transmission systems, namely, fiber optic transmitters, receivers and transceivers used in the transmission of video, audio, and data signals over optical fiber; transmitting sets, namely, cable coupling transceivers and power supplies; monitoring apparatus, namely, microphones and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video cameras and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video object recognizers, comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video object trackers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video license plate readers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video face recognizers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video vehicle recognizers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video traffic detectors comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video access door controllers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video intrusion detectors comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; processing computer hardware and software, and power supplies sold therewith, that analyze digital video images to automatically extract, record and report intelligence; monitoring apparatus, namely, remote video monitoring systems for security and surveillance applications, with manufacturing systems, comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |