Drawing for WEED COLLAR

USPTO serial 78956091

WEED COLLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEED COLLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert R. Axenfeld

Robert R. Axenfeld Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads,123 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Gardening tools, namely, plant spray shields used for protecting surrounding vegetation from herbicide sprayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 7, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance