USPTO serial 78956453
SONANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Clemente, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce B. Brunda
BRUCE B BRUNDA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio equipment, namely, loudspeakers, in-wall speakers, in-ceiling speakers, indoor/outdoor speakers, waterproof speakers, planar driver speakers, woofers and subwoofers, docking stations for connecting household audio/video players to installed audio/video equipment, audio volume controllers, multi-room audio system controllers, audio switches, audio amplifiers, audio/video cables, and speaker jacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |