USPTO serial 78957773
TIMI & LESLIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIMI & LESLIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natasha Shabani
Natasha Shabani Rutter Hobbs & Davidoff Incorporated1901 Avenue of the StarsSuite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Carrying cases for cellular telephones, portable electronic music players, portable electronic audio and video players; for portable electronic audio and video recorders, and players; for portable electronic combination cellular telephones, audio and video recorders, and players; for handheld and mobile digital electronic devices for the sending and receiving of telephone calls, electronic mail, digital data and accessing the internet; for electronic handheld units for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of data and which may also have the capability to transmit and receive voice communications; for portable handheld electronic computers; for electronic personal digital assistants; for electronic digital cameras; for electronic handheld devices for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of data that enable the user to keep track of and/or manage personal or business information; for portable and handheld electronic devices for communicating by voice and/or recording, organizing, transmitting, receiving, manipulating and reviewing text, data, audio and video files. | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, namely children's blankets, towels, hooded towels, wash cloths and burp cloths not of paper. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Timi & Leslie Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIALS BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Timi & Leslie Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named TIMI & LESLIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |