USPTO serial 78958271
MICRO CELL TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICRO CELL TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH A. BASILE
DEBORAH A BASILE DOHERTY, WALLACE, PILLSBURY & MURPHY1414 MAIN ST STE 1900SPRINGFIELD, MA 01144-1900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sports balls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |