Drawing for INTELLIGHT

USPTO serial 78958348

INTELLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lee Orzechowski

KAREN LEE ORZECHOWSKI FARKAS + BARRY, LLP1101 30TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-3772UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Barcode scanner; Barcode scannersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 2, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 2, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance