USPTO serial 78959429
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nate A. Garhart
NATE A. GARHART COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP1 FERRY BUILDINGSTE 200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4213| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education, information, and entertainment services, namely, production and presentation of video segments through broadcast television, cable television, and the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |