USPTO serial 78960035
ONLY IN NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3862191Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONLY IN NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tamara F. Carmichael
Tamara F. Carmichael OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP1325 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Earthenwear mugs; shot glasses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ONLY IN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ONLY IN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ONLY IN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Burke, Christine C.
- Other trademarks owned by Burke, Christine C.
- Other trademarks owned by Burke, Christine C.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ONLY IN NEW YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 12, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |