USPTO serial 78960098
KEY TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KEY TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George G. Grigel
George G. Grigel PAINE HAMBLEN, LLP717 W. Sprague Ave., Suite 1200SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | VIBRATORY DRIVES FOR CONVEYORS AND SHAKERS; FOOD PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY, CONVEYORS, AIR CLEANERS; VIBRATORY SEPARATORS; STEAM PRESSURE BLANCHERS; MECHANICAL SPREADERS; MECHANICAL SHAKERS FOR SEPARATING SOLIDS; SIZE LENGTH GRADERS FOR FOOD; VIBRATORY CONVEYORS; CONVEYOR BELTS; MECHANICAL GRAVITY SORTERS AND AIR SORTERS FOR FOODS; TRIMMING MACHINES FOR FOODS; SORTING MACHINES FOR HANDLING AND PROCESSING FOOD PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2006 |
| 009 | INSPECT ION AND SORTING MACHINES, NAMELY, OPTICAL INSPECTION AND SORTING MACHINES FOR INSPECTING AND SORTING FOOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS; OPTICAL SCANNERS FOR MONITORING THE COLOR OF BULK ARTICLES MOVING PAST A MONITORING STATION; SCANNERS IN THE NATURE OF HIGH RESOLUTION CAMERAS FOR MONITORING PRODUCT QUALITY; OPTICAL INSPECTION AND SORTING APPARATUS FOR IMAGING ACROSS CONVEYORS, NAMELY, OPTICAL SCANNERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, GRAVITY SORTERS AND AIR SORTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPTICAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT; AND INTELLIGENT CONTROLLERS FOR VIBRATORY CONVEYORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2006 |
| 011 | FOOD PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC PRESSURE STEAM BLANCHERS FOR COOKING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Key Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Key Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Key Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named KEY TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |