USPTO serial 78960602
RELIEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RELIEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
06560 Valbonne, FR
06560 Valbonne, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Zielinski
Robert F. Zielinski Law Offices of Robert F. Zielinski LLC1518 Walnut St.Suite 1706Philadelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of respiratory systems disease, gastrointestinal systems disease, endocrine systems disease, cardiovascular systems disease, central nervous system disease, peripheral nervous systems disease, musculoskeletal systems disease, unary system disease, integumentary system disease, reproductive system disease, skin and scalp disease, cancer, diabetes, thrombosis, arthritis, pain, inflammation, blood disease and disorders, skin disease, cold, coughs, influenza, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, migraine, mouth and gum disease, burns; dietetic substances for medical use namely meal replacement bars, meal replacement drink mixes, minerals, vitamins; medical plasters; material for dressing, namely bandages, and gauzes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |