USPTO serial 78960845
THE GOOD DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GOOD DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI LAW OFFICE OF JULIANNE B BOCHINSKIPO BOX 2723WESTPORT, CT 06880-0723UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ANTI-BACTERIAL WIPES, ALL PURPOSE DISINFECTANT SPRAYS, MEDICATED DISINFECTANT OINTMENT, MEDICAL ANTI-BACTERIAL OINTMENT; BUG REPELLENT SPRAYS AND LOTIONS; MEDICATED LOTIONS, GELS AND CREAMS TO TREAT POISON IVY; MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; SURGICAL AND WOUND CARE DRESSINGS; DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; HOMEOPATHIC SUPPLEMENTS; MEAL REPLACEMENT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DRINK MIXES; NUTRITIONAL DRINK MIX FOR USE AS A MEAL REPLACEMENT; POWDERED NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL DRINK MIX, SALINE AND NASAL RINSE, SALINE GARGLE, COUGH DROPS, COUGH SYRUP, OVER-THE-COUNTER PAIN RELIEVING MEDICATION, OVER-THE-COUNTER TEETHING AND TOOTHACHE OINTMENT, EYE DROPS; ADHESIVE BANDAGES; MEDICATED ANTI-VIRAL TISSUES; BABY FOOD AND BABY FORMULA | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS AND NEWSLETTERS ON THE SUBJECT OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, EXERCISE, VARIOUS MEDICAL CONDITIONS, PREGNANCY AND PARENTING; HEALTH CALENDARS; SYNDICATED PERIODICAL MEDICAL COLUMNS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A RADIO TALK SHOW IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, EXERCISE, MEDICAL CONDITIONS, DIET AND WEIGHT LOSS; PROVIDING A CONTINUING TELEVISION TALK SHOW IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, EXERCISE, MEDICAL CONDITIONS, DIET AND WEIGHT LOSS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. E. Neil Schachter
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. E. Neil Schachter
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE GOOD DOCTOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |