USPTO serial 78961051
SUPERMARKET CHECKOUT TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3289272Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERMARKET CHECKOUT TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Cutner
DAVID A CUTNER CUTNER & ASSOCIATES PC9 E 40TH ST FL 13NEW YORK, NY 10016-0402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others in a wide variety of fields, through the distribution of printed, audio, and audio-visual promotional materials and by rendering sales and promotion advice; advertising agency services; placing advertisements for others; production and distribution of audio video commercials; producing audio and video infomercials; product merchandising; business marketing consulting services; providing information to the public about the products and services of others via in-store delivery of full motion video, audio, text and graphic images in the form of audiovisual programs, music videos, movie previews, commercials and infomercials; and providing information to the public about the products and services of others via displays on single computers, local computer networks and the on-line global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |