USPTO serial 78963308
SCOOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3374441Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCOOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
Valley Center, CA
Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
Valley Center, CA
Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
Valley Center, CA
SAN PASQUAL CASINO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
VALLEY VIEW, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN PASQUAL CASINO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hillary A. Brooks
Hillary A. Brooks Brooks Quinn, LLC6513 132nd Ave NE #378Kirkland, WA 98033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen confections; frozen desserts, namely, ice cream, gelato, frozen yogurt, and sherbet; gelato; ice cream; and frozen yogurt sold only in applicant's casinos and casino-based establishments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2007 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; gelato and ice cream parlors; and catering services sold only in applicant's casinos and casino-based establishments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
- Other trademarks owned by Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
- Other trademarks owned by Valley View Casino, an Enterprise fund of the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
- Other trademarks owned by SAN PASQUAL CASINO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SCOOPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |