Drawing for SE(D)-DUCERE

USPTO serial 78963506

SE(D)-DUCERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SE(D)-DUCERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George Likourezos

David M. Carter Carter, DeLuca, Farrell and Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadSuite 420Melville, NY 11747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cologne; PerfumeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2007GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance