Drawing for THE WORLDWIDE WORKSPACE

USPTO serial 78963669

THE WORLDWIDE WORKSPACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WORLDWIDE WORKSPACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tsan Abrahamson

Tsan Abrahamson Cobalt LLP918 Parker StreetBldg. A21Berkeley, CA 94710

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software which allows users to participate in web-based meetings and access data, documents, and software applications through a web browserACTIVE—
038Web-based multimedia teleconferencing services; web-based multimedia videoconferencing services; web-based realtime interactive communication services which allow users to jointly access data, documents, and software applications through a web browser; and telecommunication services, namely, providing customers with secure remote access via the Internet to private computer networksACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for creating, editing, delivering and monitoring multimedia presentations via the Internet and telephone to multiple participants; and application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 5, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance