USPTO serial 78963970
WHISKEY CREEK RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHISKEY CREEK RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Pleasant, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. CRAIG KILLOUGH
B CRAIG KILLOUGH BARNWELL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMS LLCPO DRAWER HCHARLESTON, SC 29402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | RECREATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING HUNTING PRESERVES; SUMMER CAMPS AND NOT INCLUDING GOLF COURSES OR GOLF TOURNAMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLASSES ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT; RECREATIONAL CAMP SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING WILDLIFE AND NATURE STUDIES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | DUDE RANCHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |