USPTO serial 78965051
SUNVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ENERGY SUPPLYING DEVICES, NAMELY, TRANSFORMERS, INVERTERS, EACH INCLUDING ITS OWN MEASURING AND CONTROLLING DEVICES, BATTERY STORAGE DEVICES, EACH INCLUDING ITS OWN MEASURING AND CONTROLLING DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, EVALUATION SOFTWARE DESIGNED FOR INVERTER PRODUCTS AND IN PHOTO VOLTAIC INSTALLATIONS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, LOGS; VOLTAGE REGULATORS; VOLTAGE REGULATORS FOR ELECTRIC POWER; VOLTAGE STABILIZING POWER SUPPLIES; ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES; HIGH-FREQUENCY SWITCHING POWER SUPPLIES; UNINTERRUPTIBLE ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES; POWER SUPPLY CONNECTORS AND ADAPTORS FOR USE WITH PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; TRANSFORMERS; ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION BOXES; ELECTRICAL TERMINALS; JUNCTION BOXES; AUTOMATIC SWITCHBOARDS; ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CURRENT RECTIFIERS; ELECTRIC SWITCHES; INVERTERS; BATTERY CHARGERS; BATTERIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |