Drawing for TURKEY ROOST VINEYARD

USPTO serial 78965498

TURKEY ROOST VINEYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TURKEY ROOST VINEYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katja Loeffelholz

KATJA LOEFFELHOLZ GAW VANMALE SMITH MYERS & MIROGLIO, PLC1000 MAIN ST FL 3NAPA, CA 94559-2645UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 8, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 8, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 8, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance