USPTO serial 78965733
WHOLENESS PURITY RADIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHOLENESS PURITY RADIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Fremantle, AU
North Fremantle, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Benjamin
Frank S. Benjamin MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP303 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5300ATLANTA, GA 30308-3265UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Massage oils; facial cleansers; facial creams; facial lotions; facial washes; skin clarifiers; skin cleansers; skin creams; skin conditioners; skin lotions; skin moisturizer; skin soaps; skin toners; hair dressings for men; hair conditioner; hair shampoo; hair gels; hair care preparations; hair cleaning preparations; hair styling preparations; hair creams; beauty creams for body care; body and beauty care cosmetics; body and beauty care preparations; body creams; body cream soap; body lotions; body oils; body powder; body scrub; body sprays; cosmetic preparations for body care; cosmetic products for the face and body, namely, creams, lotions, gels, mists, scrubs and oils; deodorants for body care; body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; deodorant for personal use; face and body beauty creams; face and body creams; liquid soaps for hands, face and body; hair lotions; lotions for face and body care; make-up products for the face and body; non-medicated body soaps; soaps for body care; toning lotion, for the face, body and hands; cologne water; toilet water; bath beads; bath crystals; shower and bath foams; shower and bath gels; bath lotion; bath oils; bath powder; bath salts; bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; mineral salt in the nature of bath salts not for medical purposes; hair tonics; hair cleansers; hair waving lotion; scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; aromatherapy creams; aromatherapy lotions; aromatherapy oils; essential oils for personal use; body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic cleansing creams; cosmetic creams; cosmetic oils; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetic preparations and products for skin and body care, namely, creams, lotions, gels, mists, scrubs and oils; cosmetic products for the face and body, namely, creams, lotions, gels, mists, scrubs and oils; cosmetic soaps; face creams for cosmetic use; shaving preparations; shaving balms; make-up products for the face and body; make-up removers; perfumes; beauty masks; skin masks; beauty serums; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; lip balm; balms for skin; bath milks; beauty milks; face and body milks; cleansing milks; cosmetic milks; moisturizing milks; make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; eye compresses for cosmetic purposes; after sun creams; after sun lotions; non-medicated sun care preparations; sun care lotions; sun creams; after-shave balms; after-shave creams; after-shave emulsions; after-shave gel; after-shave lotions; cosmetic preparations for body care, namely, preparations for jet lag recovery; non-medicated skin creams for healing ingrown hairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |