USPTO serial 78965796
FRENCH MINICURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRENCH MINICURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Baker, Jr.
Thomas S. Baker, Jr. Thomas S. Baker Jr., Attorney at Law1371 W 3rd AvenueColumbus, OH 43212-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Artificial nails for cosmetic purposes; glaze activator for strengthening nails; nail care preparations; goods for the care of the nails, namely, nail buffing preparations, nail cream, nail enamel, nail glitter, nail tips, nail glue, nail lacquer, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, nail stencils, nail strengtheners, and nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; materials for use in making false nails, namely, nail tips, adhesives for false nails; and nail polishes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |