Drawing for RUNNER

USPTO serial 78968191

RUNNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUNNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron J. Wong

AARON J WONG PRICE HENEVELD COOPER DEWITT & LITTON, LPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020TablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 30, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 18, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance