USPTO serial 78968825
PERFECT SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3421059Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2008
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glastonbury, CT
Glastonbury, CT
CARLISLE FOODSERVICE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
Other trademarks owned by CARLISLE FOODSERVICE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L. KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2889UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | heat sealing machines for food service industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dinex International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dinex International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLISLE FOODSERVICE PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PERFECT SEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |