Drawing for HIRO

USPTO serial 78969364

HIRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROMAGHIM, PETER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HIRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Krieger

MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWRSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely energy drinks containing extracts from the Morinda citrifolia plant, distributed through a dedicated network marketing networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2008MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 18, 2008ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 29, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 16, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance