Drawing for LAZER

USPTO serial 78969799

LAZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRATER, JILL I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy J. Benjamin, Robert J. Sacco, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Eric A. Prager, Karin Segall, Laura J. Winston, Abigail Rubinstein and Kathryn Starnella

Amy J. Benjamin, Robert J. Sacco, Andrew Baum, Pau Seyfarth Shaw LLPTwo Seaport Lane, Suite 300World Trade Center EastBoston, MA 02210-2028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer carrying casesACTIVE—
018luggage, suitcases, garment bags for travel, all purpose sports bags, toiletry cases sold empty, shoulder bags, carrying cases, tote bags, rolling tote bags, duffle bags, rolling duffle bags, backpacks, rolling backpacksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance