Drawing for SPARX

USPTO serial 78970170

SPARX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Schaffer

David Schaffer MILES & STOCKBRIDGE1751 PINNACLE DRIVESUITE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Helmets for Cycling; PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR, NAMELY, SUNGLASSES AND GOGGLES Body protectors for motorcycling; protective clothing for motor cyclists, namely, gloves, jackets, pants, caps, hats and body shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 5, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance