USPTO serial 78970266
FUN QUENCHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3500306Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2008
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUN QUENCHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laguna Hills, CA
Laguna Hills, CA
Laguna Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce B. Brunda
BRENLIN INC27071 CABOT ROADSUITE 132LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Noncarbonated fruit beverages | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 25, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |