USPTO serial 78970355
UGO BORELI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UGO BORELI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. Michael Sajovec
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVECPO BOX 37428RALEIGH, NC 27627-7428UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, suits, dresses, blazers, coats, jackets, pants, anoraks, overcoats, car coats, raincoat, safari jacket, bermudas , jeans, blouses, shirts, polos, t-shirts, sweat shirts, sweat pants, pull over, sweaters, cardigans, swimwear, bathing suits, bikinis, swimsuits, sleepwear, night-gowns, night shirts, housecoats, pajamas, socks, nylon stockings, stockings, underwear, bathing caps, caps, hats, ties, bow-ties, gloves, braces, belts, shawls, scarves and shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |